When leaders calculate the cost of a decision, they usually think about what could go wrong after the decision is made. They consider the money that might be lost, the people who could be affected and the possibility that another option would have produced a better outcome. What they often fail to calculate is the cost of waiting.
An imperfect decision made early can cost considerably less than a perfect decision made after the opportunity has disappeared. By the time every uncertainty has been removed, the customer may have chosen someone else, the strongest candidate may have accepted another job, the market may have changed or the problem may have become far more expensive to solve.
Delay is not the absence of a decision. It is part of the decision and should be evaluated as one of its costs.
Decisions create learning
You learn faster when you make decisions because a decision produces evidence. It allows you to see what works, what fails, what you misunderstood and what you should change the next time. An idea that remains under consideration cannot teach you as much as an action whose outcome you can observe.
The decisions you have not made contain lessons you have not yet learned.
This is one reason I prefer to decide, observe the result and improve quickly. Even when a decision produces a good outcome, I still ask whether it could have been made or executed better. Success does not mean the process was perfect. Perhaps we spent more than was necessary, moved more slowly than we should have, communicated poorly or succeeded for a reason different from the one we originally assumed.
Every decision can therefore improve the quality of the next one, provided that the leader is humble enough to review it honestly. The objective is not to prove that the original decision was correct. The objective is to become better at making decisions.
Leaders who postpone decisions because they are afraid of being wrong also postpone the learning that would make them more capable. They remain inexperienced, not because they lack intelligence, but because they have protected themselves from the evidence that action produces.
Speed does not mean carelessness
Making fast decisions does not mean behaving impulsively or refusing to consider the consequences. Some decisions involve substantial capital, legal obligations, people’s livelihoods or risks that cannot easily be reversed. Those decisions deserve careful analysis.
However, careful analysis should have a deadline. A leader should know what information is essential, who needs to contribute and when the decision must be made. Otherwise, the search for more information becomes a respectable way of avoiding responsibility.
The speed of a decision should also reflect how reversible it is. If the company can test an idea cheaply, observe the result and reverse it without serious damage, there is little reason to spend several weeks debating it. Make the decision, run the experiment and learn. Reserve the longest deliberation for decisions whose consequences are difficult or impossible to reverse.
Many organizations do the opposite. They spend enormous time discussing small, reversible choices, yet make consequential decisions under pressure because the earlier delays have removed their options.
Help your team decide
One of the responsibilities of leadership is to help the team make decisions without requiring every issue to return to the founder. If people cannot act until the leader approves every detail, the company will eventually move at the speed of one person’s availability.
Teams need clarity about the outcomes they own, the limits of their authority, the amount they may spend and the circumstances in which a decision must be escalated. Once those boundaries are clear, people should be expected to act.
When a decision is delayed, ask what is preventing it. Is important information missing? Is ownership unclear? Is the person afraid of being punished if the outcome is imperfect? Does the decision require authority the person has not been given? Or has the team simply developed a habit of discussing problems without resolving them?
The answer matters because telling people to move faster will not solve a structural problem. Leaders must remove the obstacles that make speed unsafe, but after those obstacles have been removed, the team must accept responsibility for deciding and executing.
AI has changed the acceptable speed of work
Artificial intelligence has removed many of the practical excuses for slow administrative work. I use AI to take notes during meetings, organize the discussion into action points and prepare something I can send to the team almost immediately. Work that once required someone to replay a meeting, reconstruct the conversation and manually prepare a summary can now be completed within minutes.
The same principle applies to research, analysis, writing, product planning and several other parts of modern work. AI does not remove the need for human judgment, but it reduces the time required to organize information and arrive at a point where judgment can be exercised.
If a routine task is still consuming a substantial amount of your time, there is a strong possibility that you are approaching it the wrong way or using an outdated process. The first response should not always be to hire another person or accept a longer timeline. It should be to ask whether the work can be removed, redesigned, automated or completed with better tools.
This is not merely about productivity. It affects the speed at which a company can learn. When meeting notes become action points immediately, decisions are less likely to disappear between conversations. When research can be conducted faster, experiments can begin earlier. When information is organized properly, leaders can spend more time exercising judgment rather than performing repetitive work.
Opportunity does not wait for certainty
There will always be reasons to wait. More information may become available, another option may appear and the future may become clearer. The problem is that opportunity also moves while the leader is waiting.
The best leaders are not necessarily those who are always correct the first time. They are often the people who can make a reasonable decision with the available information, observe reality without defending their ego and adjust before the cost of being wrong becomes fatal.
Make the decision as soon as you have enough information to act responsibly. If it is reversible, test it quickly. If it produces the wrong outcome, correct it. If it succeeds, still examine how it could have been done better. Then carry that learning into the next decision.
The cost of a decision is not limited to what happens when you act. Sometimes the greater cost is everything that becomes impossible because you waited.
Leave a Reply